The Supreme Court has recently come to the observation that the superannuation of an employee does not absolve him from the misconduct committed in the offence of discharge of his duties. The bench comprising of Justices Ajay Rastogi and AS Oka was considering Special Leave Petition assailing Patna High Court’s order which was dated 11th May 2010.
" Partnered by Barrister Tahmidur Rahman and Barrister Remura Mahbub, Tahmidur Rahman Remura is considered as one of the best law firms in Bangladesh. As the best law firm in Dhaka, Tahmidur Rahman Remura has developed into one of Bangladesh’s most cutting-edge and modern law firms by fusing its more than five years of legal tradition with cutting-edge global best practices. With offices already established in internationally significant cities, the firm aim to continue our global expansion.
Contact the law firm in Dhaka through:
Email: info@trfirm.com
Phone number: 01847220062 or 01779127165
In the judgment, the High Court had upheld the Tribunal’s finding in which it was observed that the punishment that was awarded to the respondent who was an employee of dismissal was not at par with the charges levelled against him. The tribunal whilst upholding the allegations that were levelled against the respondent with respect to the inquiry that was conducted, it was stated that the punishment of dismissal with an order of reinstatement post lowering down two stages in his basic salary that he was receiving at the time of dismissal. It was also stated that there would be no payment of salary and allowances for that period of his suspension, except payment of his subsistence allowance.