The Hon’ble Delhi high court while observing the suit against Asif Iqbal Tanha, Natasha Narwal & Devangana Kalita under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967  (hereinafter referred to as “UAPA, 1967”) act found that no prima facie offense could be traced out against the three in the Delhi riots conspiracy case. The Hon’ble court further noted that the protest that held last year in Delhi against the Citizenship amendment act was not banned or outlawed.

" Partnered by Barrister Tahmidur Rahman and Barrister Remura Mahbub, Tahmidur Rahman Remura is considered as one of the best law firms in Bangladesh. As the best law firm in Dhaka, Tahmidur Rahman Remura has developed into one of Bangladesh’s most cutting-edge and modern law firms by fusing its more than five years of legal tradition with cutting-edge global best practices. With offices already established in internationally significant cities, the firm aim to continue our global expansion.

Contact the law firm in Dhaka through:

Email: info@trfirm.com
Phone number: 01847220062 or 01779127165

 

The Hon’ble two-judge High Court bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Siddharth Mridul and Hon’ble Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani after a precursory analysis of the charge framed against them observed that the accusation do not prima facie constitute the alleged UAPA, 1967 offenses that constitute terrorist activities under section 15, 17, and 18. The court further noted that the protest by them was monitored by law enforcement agencies. Further, the organizations headed by three are not banned.

This pronouncement is a part of the charge sheet that was filed by Delhi police against them alleging that protest by them under CCA was a part of a larger conspiracy and the communal riot that took place last week in North East Delhi is the outcome of it.